Who reviews medical content on MedicalRecords.com and how?

MedicalRecords.com uses a revision-bound review workflow: research and source capture, clinician review where medical claims require it, editorial review, claim-level fact-checking, and update monitoring. Dr. George T. Mathew (MD, MBA, FACP) is a designated clinical review leader. A public review claim appears only after the reviewer, review time, and exact approved revision are recorded.

Medical Review Process

Medical review is tied to the exact version a clinician approved. Work continues while a page is review-pending, but no reviewer badge or review date appears until that approval is recorded. Here is how the process works and who is accountable.

Durjoy BhattacharjyaFounder & CEOHealthcare Technology

How is medical content reviewed on MedicalRecords.com?

Medical content moves through source capture, clinical review when required, editorial review, claim-level fact-checking, and update monitoring. Work can continue while review is pending, but a page may claim completed medical review only when approval is recorded against the exact published revision.

Dr. George T. Mathew (MD, MBA, FACP) is a designated clinical review leader. His expected review does not create a completed-review claim: the reviewer, timestamp, and approved revision must be recorded first, and later material edits require re-review.

Our Commitment to Accuracy

Bad health information gets people hurt. A wrong dosage, a missed interaction, an outdated guideline presented as current fact. We publish health content to millions of readers, and Ace takes that responsibility personally. Our publication standard requires content to be:

Accurate — Based on current medical knowledge and research
Clear — Written in accessible language without sacrificing precision
Actionable — Provides practical guidance patients can use
Ethical — Respects patient autonomy and promotes informed decision-making

Our 5-Step Review Process

Step 1

Research & Drafting

Writers start with peer-reviewed journals, CDC/FDA/HHS sources, and official hospital documentation. No Wikipedia. No press releases treated as evidence. If we cannot find a primary source, the claim does not go in.

Step 2

Medical Expert Review

Medical drafts are assigned to a qualified clinician for review. Dr. George T. Mathew (MD, MBA, FACP) is a designated clinical review leader; a page remains review-pending until the reviewer, timestamp, and exact approved revision are recorded.

Step 3

Editorial Review

Our editorial team rewrites medical jargon into plain language without losing precision. If a sentence requires a medical degree to parse, it gets rewritten until a non-specialist can understand it.

Step 4

Fact-Checking

Material statistics, dosages, and clinical claims must link to the original source before approval. "Studies show" is not enough: unresolved or weakly sourced claims remain blocked from an approved review state.

Step 5

Publication & Monitoring

Published pages show an author and genuine update date. A reviewer name and review date appear only after approval of that exact revision; later content changes return the page to review-pending until re-approved.

Medical Advisory Board

Dr. George T. Mathew (MD, MBA, FACP), a physician executive whose experience spans clinical practice, healthcare technology, and enterprise strategy, is a designated clinical review leader. He is expected to review medical work before it receives a completed-review label. Until that event is recorded against the exact revision, the page remains review-pending.

Every reviewer must:

Hold active credentials in their field
Disclose any potential conflicts of interest
Stay current with developments in their specialty
Follow our editorial guidelines for medical review

Meet Our Advisors

Our Quality Standards

Source Quality

Peer-reviewed journals, government agencies (CDC, FDA, HHS), and established medical institutions. Not health blogs, not press releases, not vendor marketing materials.

Recency

Each medical topic receives a risk-based review cadence. Drug safety, dosages, clinical guidance, and regulatory changes require earlier review; timestamps change only when the underlying content changes.

Disclosure

We are not doctors and this is not medical advice. We say that clearly. We tell you when to call your provider and when to call 911. We do not play pretend physician.

Corrections

Reported errors are triaged promptly. Material corrections are documented on the page, and any change to reviewed medical content invalidates the prior revision approval until re-review.

Important Notice

The information on MedicalRecords.com is intended for educational purposes only and should not be considered medical advice. Always consult with qualified healthcare providers for diagnosis, treatment, and answers to your personal health questions. If you have a medical emergency, call 911 or your local emergency services immediately.

Report a Concern

Spotted a wrong dosage, an outdated guideline, or a claim that does not match the source? Tell us. We investigate every report and document material corrections. Reader reports remain an important part of that quality feedback loop.

Contact Medical Review Team

About Us Editorial Policy Advisory Board Our Founder

Related resources